[Syndromes or symptoms in the assessment of aphasic patients?]. / ¿Síndromes o síntomas en la evaluación de los pacientes afásicos?

The procedure generally used to diagnose aphasic patients consists of classifying them in one of the classic syndromes on the basis of the analysis of their symptoms. However, this taxonomy has several important problems, the main one being that it does not take into account the variability of aphasic patients, as there are many more disorder profiles than those included in the syndromes. In order to test the homogeneity of a sample of patients diagnosed with the classic taxonomy, 15 aphasic patients (5 Broca, 5 Wernicke and 5 Conduction) and 5 healthy controls were tested with nine comprehension and production tasks. Participants were aged 38 to 81 years old. The results indicate the existence of great variability in patients labeled with the same diagnosis, as revealed by the differences in within-group scores in each task, and a limited adjustment to the expected profile, with some patients showing symptoms allegedly corresponding to other syndromes. Our results call attention to the need to study each patient individually and interpret their disorders regardless of the syndromes.

¿Síndromes o síntomas en la evaluación de los pacientes afásicos? / Syndromes or symptoms in the assessment of aphasic patients?

El procedimiento generalmente empleado para diagnosticar a los pacientes afásicos consiste en analizar sus síntomas y en base a esos síntomas clasificarlos en uno de los síndromes clásicos. Sin embargo, esa taxonomía tiene algunos problemas importantes, el principal que no tiene en cuenta la variedad de pacientes afásicos existentes, ya que hay muchos más trastornos de los que recogen los síndromes. Con objeto de comprobar el grado de homogeneidad de una muestra de pacientes pertenecientes a diferentes síndromes, en este estudio se aplicaron nueve tareas de comprensión y producción oral a quince pacientes (cinco afásicos de Broca, cinco de Wernicke y cinco de Conducción) y a cinco personas sanas, con edades comprendidas entre 38 y 81 años. Los resultados muestran la existencia de una gran heterogeneidad entre los pacientes etiquetados bajo un mismo síndrome, tal como indica la variabilidad de puntuaciones dentro de los grupos en cada tarea. Por otra parte se observa un escaso ajuste al perfil esperado, ya que algunos pacientes presentan síntomas correspondientes a otros síndromes. Nuestros resultados sugieren la necesidad de estudiar a cada paciente de forma individual e interpretar sus trastornos independientemente de los síndromes (AU)

The procedure generally used to diagnose aphasic patients consists of classifying them in one of the classic syndromes on the basis of the analysis of their symptoms. However, this taxonomy has several important problems, the main one being that it does not take into account the variability of aphasic patients, as there are many more disorder profiles than those included in the syndromes. In order to test the homogeneity of a sample of patients diagnosed with the classic taxonomy, 15 aphasic patients (5 Broca, 5 Wernicke and 5 Conduction) and 5 healthy controls were tested with nine comprehension and production tasks. Participants were aged 38 to 81 years old. The results indicate the existence of great variability in patients labeled with the same diagnosis, as revealed by the differences in within-group scores in each task, and a limited adjustment to the expected profile, with some patients showing symptoms allegedly corresponding to other syndromes. Our results call attention to the need to study each patient individually and interpret their disorders regardless of the syndromes (AU)

Acquired surface alexia in Spanish: a case report.

This paper reports a case study of acquired surface alexia in Spanish and discusses the most suitable tests to detect this syndrome in a writing system that is very regular for reading at the segmental and supra-segmental levels. Patient MM has surface alexia characterized by quantitatively good performance in reading words and pseudowords; accurate but slow and syllabic reading of words, nonwords and sentences; good performance in lexical decision tasks including words and nonwords; errors in lexical decision with pseudohomophones; and homophone confusions. This pattern of reading can be interpreted as a disorder in the lexical reading route and overdependence on the non-lexical route. We discuss nonlexical impairments and the interpretation of alexia and suggest tasks to identify surface alexia in a shallow orthography.